Stream fusion and composability (Java 8 and Haskell) for newbies

In an online discussion, when Java 8 released their stream API, written about here, you can write e.g.

public List<Article> getAllJavaArticles() {
        .filter(article -> article.getTags().contains("Java"))

Someone asked, “But my question: would the streams be faster than loops? Or is the only benefit better readability?” Someone answered that the benefit is that streams compose and loops don’t. What does composable mean here? Below is my answer, using two languages I know, JavaScript and Haskell.

Composable in this context means: To be able to compose two things into one without redundancy or overhead. For example, consider you want to map a function f over an array arr to produce a new array, you might do this:

var arr2 = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)

If you want to filter the array based on a predicate p, you might do this:

var arr3 = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr2.length; i++)
    if (p(arr2[i]))

Or maybe you want to take all elements until a a predicate p2 is not satisfied:

var arr4 = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr3.length; i++)
    if (p2(arr3[i]))

Now, if you want to do that all in one process you have a few options:

An ideal stream API will give you the last point, but be able to understand concepts like mapping and filtering and know how to merge them together into an efficient loop. This is called stream fusion, which you can google if you want to know more.

I don’t know Java but I can give a Haskell example:

map f . filter p . takeWhile p2

(Note: In Haskell the operations separated by . are run right to left, like map f (filter p (takeWhile p2 …)).)

If I compile this with GHC, e.g.

main = print ((map f . filter p . takeWhile p2) [1..10])
  where p2 = (<5)
        p = even
        f = (+2)

and look at the reduced output called Core, a language the compiler generates code for before generating assembly or byte code, the map f . filter p are both compiled into a single loop (Core output is verbose, so I collapsed it into this more readable form). This just walks over the list, checks whether the item is even, if so, keeps it and adds 2 to it, otherwise skips that item:

mainzugo xs =
  case xs of
    [] -> []
    (x:ys) ->
      case even x of
        False -> mainzugo ys
        True -> x + 2 : mainzugo ys

Which is pretty nifty. Furthermore, if you fold (also called reducing) e.g.

foldr (+) 0 . map f . filter p

Then that whole thing is also compiled into one loop:

mainzugo xs =
  case xs of
    [] -> 0
    (x:ys) ->
      case even x of
        False -> mainzugo ys
        True -> (x + 2) + mainzugo ys

There’re limits to what can compose with what, though.